Golden Globes 2010

19 Jan

I must admit, I forgot about the Golden Globe Awards this year. I don’t know how how. I live in LA. They were held about 20 miles from my house. I just flat out forgot.

I don’t actually watch the awards show anyway. I only watch the preshow and see what the nominees are wearing. I like to form my opinion on the ensembles before the “experts” weigh in. 

I never agree with them anyway. Seriously, they are so annoying. You cannot tell me some tiered, feathery, looks like someone just threw up on it, ball gown is beautiful just because it’s a vintage Chanel or House of Dior. I could care less. Don’t care who designed it or how many people it took to sew.

If I wouldn’t want to wear it, then it’s ugly (why would i want to wear a ball gown though? I don’t go anywhere except PTA meetings and mommy/me class).

So, of course I get really excited when the mom celebs look hot, and I’m glad that my 2 favs are both moms.

Halle Berry took a risk, and although I though it was a little skanky for the Golden Globes and for a woman with such obvious beauty (why show so much skin?), she’s so radiant and confident that she made it work. She’s 43 years old and has a toddler. Her dress is by Kaufaman Franco.

My other fave is Kate Winslett. Not a big Kate Winslett movie fan, but she’s a mom, 34 years old, has 2 kids, and she looked amazing. I loved the chic simplicity of her (Yves Saint Laurent) dress and the Tiffany jewels were classic and breathtaking.

 

8 Responses to “Golden Globes 2010”

  1. pradamama January 19, 2010 at 5:25 PM #

    I didn’t like Halle’s dress. It was too revealing. I liked Kate. My favorite was Penelope Cruz.

  2. lamom January 19, 2010 at 5:28 PM #

    I liked Anna Paquin and Julia Roberts.

  3. headhotmama January 19, 2010 at 5:32 PM #

    I liked Penelope Cruz too. The subtle black lace was pretty. But until she starts spitting out or taking care of some babies, she doesn’t make my cut.

  4. headhotmama January 19, 2010 at 5:34 PM #

    Anna Paquin was okay….but Julia Roberts?! NO WAY! She looked nice to be doing lunch at The Ivy or maybe even The Polo Lounge, but not the Golden Globes. Way too casual.

  5. headhotmama January 19, 2010 at 5:34 PM #

    But I will cut Julia some slack since she has 3 kids. I liked her necklace :)

  6. Mary Shrimper January 19, 2010 at 9:17 PM #

    Since I’m usually viewing content on my BB I reviewed the pictures in a frame-by-frame way. When I first saw H.B. dress I was like “that’s not to much skin and I didn’t care for the strap in the back.” But as I scrolled down, the puropse of that strap became more apparent. You GEAUX H.B! You are still a Hot Mama! But I have to agree with Hot Mama,you don’t have to unvail all your goods! You r a radiant young lady your face alone is enough eye candy. But if u got it, flaunt it! H.B. Definitly has it.

  7. headhotmama January 20, 2010 at 4:43 PM #

    Agreed Ms. Shrimper. I realized that if she were a woman with no kids, I would be annoyed that she was showing so much skin, but the fact that she’s had a child makes it SUPER HOT that she can still rock something like this. But yes, Halle’s face alone is so gorgeous that she could have worn a Whole Foods recycleable shopping bag and still been flawless.

  8. RImom January 26, 2010 at 5:15 PM #

    Halle is beautiful but could have chosen a better dress. Kate Winslett is somewhat plain Jane to me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.